Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Seed germination of Cirsium arvense and Lepidium latifolium: Implications for management of montane wetlands

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cirsium arvense and Lepidium latifolium are species that can aggressively invade wetland margins and potentially reduce biodiversity and alter ecosystem function. Although expansion of these species primarily occurs via rhizomatous growth, seeds are thought to be important in initial establishment. We conducted this study to investigate differences in seed germination of C. arvense and L. latifolium in montane wetlands of Colorado and Wyoming, USA. We used germination chambers to simulate environmental conditions (photoperiod, day/night temperature) during three periods of the growing season at each site and evaluated seed germination in relation to three soil moisture levels and two soil depths. A combination of shallow (<1 cm) seed burial and wet conditions resulted in the greatest germination probability of C. arvense (x = 63.0%), 95% CI = 41.2–80.5%), whereas deep (2–3 cm) seed burial and saturated moisture conditions resulted in almost no germination (x = 0.3%, 95% CI = 0.1–1.3%). The maximum germination probability of 44.0% (CI = 28.1–61.4%) for L. latifolium also occurred in the shallow burial and wet treatment; however, only effects of seed burial were significant (P < 0.05). The estimated mean germination probability of deeply buried seeds was < 1.0% (CI = 0.3–1.4%) compared to 32% (CI = 19.7–47.9%) for shallowly buried seeds. Our results suggest that each species has the ability to germinate at similar rates throughout the growing season and across a large portion of the moisture gradient. This suggests that management actions, including water-level manipulations, at any time during the growing season may stimulate germination. Although burial of seed to depths of 2–3 cm reduced the germination potential of both species, the use of mechanical implements may be problematic in established stands because new plants of both species easily sprout from root buds. Further, disturbance resulting from such actions diminishes the density and vigor of other plants already present, which may ultimately decrease the competitive resistance of the disturbed environment to invasion by outside species. Detection of new invasions is a critical component of any integrated weed management program. Our results indicate that the incidence of C. arvense and L. latifolium germination is most likely in areas with seeds that are within 1 cm of the soil surface and soil moisture is 75–100% of field capacity for extended periods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Babbitt, B. 1998. Statement by Secretary of the Interior on invasive alien species. Proceedings of the National Weed Symposium, Denver, CO, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, R. G. 1995. Description of the Ecoregions of the United States, second edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, H. G. 1974. The evolution of weeds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5: 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, D. 1960. A comparative life-history study of Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. and Tussilago farfara (L.), the most troublesome weeds in the newly reclaimed polders of the former Zuiderzee. p. 205–222. In J. L. Harper (ed.) The Biology of Weeds. Symposium of the British Ecology Society, Number 1, Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baskin, C. C. and J. M. Baskin. 1998. Seeds: Ecology, Biogeography, and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belcher, J. W. and S. D. Wilson. 1989. Leafy spurge and the species composition of a mixed-grass prairie. Journal of Range Management 42: 172–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blank, R. R. 2002. Amidohydrolase activity, soil N status, and the invasive crucifer Lepidium latifolium. Plant and Soil 239: 155–163.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blank, R. R. and J. A. Young. 1997. Lepidium latifolium: influences on soil properties, rate of spread, and competitive nature, p. 69–80. In J. H. Brock, M. Wade, P. Pyšek, and D. Green (eds.) Plant Invasions: Studies from North America and Europe. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, R. R. and J. A. Young. 2002. Influence of the exotic invasive crucifer, Lepidium latifolium, on soil properties and elemental cycling. Soil Science 167: 821–829.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bostock, S. J. 1978. Seed germination strategies of five perennial weeds. Oecologia 36: 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, C. N. 1974. The Nature and Properties of Soils, eighth edition. Macmillan Publishing, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breslow, N. E. and D. G. Clayton. 1993. Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88: 9–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H. and R. G. Qualls. 2003. Anaerobic metabolism in the roots of seedlings of the invasive exotic Lepidium latifolium. Environmental and Experimental Botany 50: 29–40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., R. G. Qualls, and G. C. Miller. 2002. Adaptive responses of Lepidium latifolium to soil flooding: biomass allocation, adventitious rooting, aerenchyma formation and ethylene production. Environmental and Experimental Botany 48: 119–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Come, D., F. Corbineau, and P. Soudain. 1991. Beneficial effects of oxygen deprivation on germination and plant development. p. 69–83. In M. B. Jackson, D. D. Davies, and H. Lambers (eds.) Plant Life Under Oxygen Deprivation. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D. J., D. M. Merritt, D. C. Andersen, and R. A. Chimner. 1999. Factors controlling the establishment of Fremont cottonwood seedlings on the upper Green River, USA. Regulated Rivers Research & Management 15: 419–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiTomaso, J. M. 2000. Invasive weeds in rangelands: species, impacts, and management. Weed Science 48: 255–265.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donald, W. 1990. Management and control of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Reviews of Weed Science 5: 193–250.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, S. G. 1997. Flood-borne noxious weeds: impacts on riparian areas and wetlands. 1997 Symposium Proceedings, California Exotic Pest Plant Council, Sacramento, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Euliss, N. H., Jr., J. W. LaBaugh, L. H. Fredrickson, D. M. Mushet, M. K. Laubhan, G. A. Swanson, T. C. Winter, D. O. Rosenberry, and R. D. Nelson. 2004. The wetland continuum: a conceptual framework for interpreting biological studies in the prairie pothole region of North America. Wetlands 24: 448–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. E. 1984. Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense): a literature review of management practices. Natural Areas Journal 4: 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, L. H. and T. S. Taylor. 1982. Management of seasonally flooded impoundments for wildlife. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. Resource Publication 148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, L. H. and M. K. Laubhan. 1994. Intensive wetland management: a key to biodiversity. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 59: 555–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. W. and W. H. Marshall. 1963. Ecology of water level manipulation on a northern marsh. Ecology 44: 331–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, A. 1934. Distribution and reproduction of Canada thistle in Iowa. American Journal of Botany 21: 355–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimann, B. and G. W. Cussans. 1996. The importance of seeds and sexual reproduction in the population biology of Cirsium arvense—a literature review. Weed Research 36: 493–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, R. J. 1989. The nature and effects of disturbance relative to invasions. p. 389–405. In J. A. Drake, H. A. Mooney, F. di Castri, R. H. Groves, F. J. Kruger, M. Rejmanek, and M. Williamson (eds.) Biological Invasions: a Global Perspective. John Wiley and Sons, Brisbane, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, R. J. and L. F. Heunneke. 1992. Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: implications for conservation. Conservation Biology 6: 324–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, J. M. 1968. The nature, ecology, and control of Canada thistle. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, USA. Technical Bulletin 1386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howald, A. 2000. Lepidium latifolium L. p. 227–227. In C. C. Bossard, J. M. Randall, and M. C. Hoshovsky (eds.) Invasive Plants of California’s Wildlands. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, M. A. 1994. Biological Diversity: the Coexistence of Species on Changing Landscapes. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, M. 1992. Vegetation management guideline: Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense L.). Natural Areas Journal 12: 160–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keddy, P. A. and P. Constabel. 1986. Germination of ten shoreline plants in relation to seed size, soil particle size and water level: an experimental study. Ecology 74: 133–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger-Mangold, J., R. L. Sheley, and B. D. Roos. 2002. Maintaining plant community diversity in a waterfowl production area by controlling Canada thistle (Circium arvense) using glyphosate. Weed Technology 16: 457–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, B. and M. White. 2001. Canada thistle management. Iowa State University, University Extension, Ames, IA, USA. Fact sheet BL-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laubhan, M. K. 2004. Variation in wetland hydrology, soils, vegetation, and invertebrates among Geologic Provinces. p. 23–51. In M. C. McKinstry, W. A. Hubert, and S. H. Anderson (eds.) Wetland and Riparian Areas of the Intermountain West: Ecology and Management. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laubhan, M. K., S. L. King, and L. H. Fredrickson. 2005. Managing wetlands for wildlife. p. 797–838. In C. E. Braun (ed.) Techniques for Wildlife Investigations and Management. Sixth edition. Allen Press, Lawrence, KS, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littell, R. C., G. A. Milliken, W. W. Stroup, and R. D. Wolfinger. 1996. SAS system for mixed models. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonsdale, W. M. 1999. Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80: 1522–1536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, P. N., W. K. Lauenroth, and I. C. Burke. 2002. Effects of nitrogen availability on the growth of native grasses and exotic weeds. Journal of Range Management 55: 94–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mack, R. N. 1995. Understanding the processes of weed invasions: the influence of environmental stochasticity. British Crop Protection Council Symposium Proceedings: Weeds in a Changing World 64: 65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, R. N. 1996. Predicting the identity and fate of plant invaders: emergent and emerging approaches. Biological Conservation 78: 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mack, R. N., D. Simberloff, W. M. Lonsdale, H. Evans, M. Clout, and F. A. Bazzaz. 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecological Applications 10: 689–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masters, R. A. and R. L. Sheley. 2001. Principles and practices for managing rangeland invasive plants. Journal of Range management 54: 502–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh, P. and J. A. Nelder. 1989. Generalized Linear Models, second edition. Chapman and Hall, London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. K., J. A. Young, and R. A. Evans. 1986. Germination of seeds of perennial pepperweed (Lepidium latifolium). Weed Science 34: 252–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch, W. J. and J. G. Gosselink. 2000. Wetlands, third edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. J. 1975. The biology of Canadian weeds 13: Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 55: 1033–1048.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, A. and P. A. Keddy. 1983. The depth profile of a shoreline seedbank in Matchedash Lake, Ontario. Canadian Journal of Botany 61: 3293–3296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuzzo, V. 2000. Element stewardship abstract: Cirsium arvense. In Weeds on the Web: The Nature Conservancy Wildland Invasive Species Program. Available at http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/ esadocs/cirsarve.html [accessed 7/2003].

  • Office of Technology Assessment. 1993. Harmful non-indigenous species in the United States. U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, USA. OTA-F-565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, B. E. 1999. Impacts of noxious weeds on ecological and economic systems. p. 5–18. In R. L. Sheley and J. K. Petroff (eds.) Biology and Management of Noxious Rangeland Weeds. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, OR, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, I. M., S. K. Mertens, and D. K. Schemske. 1993. Distribution of seven native and two exotic plants in tallgrass prairie in southeastern Wisconsin: the importance of human disturbance. American Midland Naturalist 130: 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D. L. Lach, R. Zuniga, and D. Morrison. 2000. Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. Bioscience 50: 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rejmanek, M. 1989. Invasibility of plant communities. p. 369–388. In J. A. Drake, H. A. Mooney, F.di Castri, R. H. Groves, F. J. Kruger, M. Rejmanek, and M. Williamson (eds.) Biological Invasions: a Global Perspective. John Wiley and Sons, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risinger, M., W. Wyatt, and K. Carver. 1997. Estimating soil moisture by feel and appearance. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Pacific Region Pocket Handbook, Water Management Note, High Plains Underground Water Conservation District Number 1.

  • Robbins, W. W., M. K. Bellue, and W. S. Ball. 1951. Weeds of California. State Printing Office, Sacramento, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, H. A. and R. J. Chancellor. 1979. Periodicity of seedling emergence and achene survival in some species of Carduus, Cirsium and Onopordum. Journal of Applied Ecology 16: 641–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romme, W. H., L. Bohland, C. Persichetty, and T. Caruso. 1995. Germination ecology of some common forest herbs in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, U.S.A. Arctic and Alpine Research 27: 407–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, Inc. 1999. SAS/STAT User’s Guide. Online Doc® Version 8, Cary, NC, USA.

  • Sheley, R. L. 1997. Integrated weed management. p. 8–10. In Management of Perennial Pepperweed (Tall Whitetop). Agricultural Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA. Special Report 972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D. 1981. Community effects of introduced species. p. 53–80. In M. H. Nitecki (ed.) Biotic Crises in Ecological and Evolutionary Time. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, R. L., M. A. Leck, and V. T. Parker. 1989. Seed banks: general concepts and methodological issues. p. 3–21. In M. A. Leck, V. T. Parker, and R. L. Simpson (eds.) Ecology of Soil Seed Banks. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. D. and A. K. Knapp. 1999. Exotic plant species in a C-4-dominated grassland: invasibility, disturbance, and community structure. Oecologia 120: 605–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stachon, W. J. and R. L. Zimdahl. 1980. Allelopathic activity of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) in Colorado. Weed Science 28: 83–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temple, S. 1990. The nasty necessity: eradicating exotics. Conservation Biology 4: 113–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trammell, M. A. and J. L. Butler. 1995. Effects of exotic plants on native ungulate use of habitat. Journal of Wildlife Management 59: 808–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, C. E. 1988. Ecology of invasions by weeds. p. 41–55. In M. A. Altieri and M. Liebman (eds.) Weed Management of Agroecosystems: Ecological Approaches. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 1999. Browns Park National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Browns Park National Wildlife Refuge, Maybell, CO, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002a. Monte Vista—Alamosa National Wildlife Refuge Complex Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Monte Vista—Alamosa National Wildlife Refuge Complex and Division of Refuge Planning, Region 6, Denver, CO, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002b. Seedskadee National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Seedskadee National Wildlife Refuge and Division of Refuge Planning, Region, 6, Denver, CO, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Valk, A. G. and R. L. Pederson. 1989. Seed banks and the management and restoration of natural vegetation. p. 329–346. In M. A. Leck, V. T. Parker, and R. L. Simpson (eds.) Ecology of Soil Seed Banks. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek, P. M. 1986. Biological invasions and ecosystem properties: can species make a difference? Ecological Studies 58: 163–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, H. (ed.). 1973. Vegetation of the Earth, second edition. Springer-Verlag Press, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcove, D. S., D. Rothstein, J. Dubow, A. Phillips, and E. Losos. 1998. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience 48: 607–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. G. 1979. Germination and seedling development of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Science 27: 146–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. G. 1992. Canada thistle. Cooperative Extension, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA. Circular G80-509-A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. G. and S. D. Kachman. 1999. Effect of perennial grasses on Canada thistle (Circium arvense) control. Weed Technology 13: 83–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. D., D. R. J. Moore, and P. A. Keddy. 1993. Relationships of marsh seed banks to vegetation patterns along environmental gradients. Freshwater Biology 29: 361–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windell, J. T., B. E. Willard, and S. Q. Foster. 1986. Introduction to Rocky Mountain wetlands. p. 1–41. In J. T. Windell, B. E. Willard, D. J. Cooper, S. Q. Foster, C. F. Knud-Hansen, L. P. Rink, and G. N. Kiladis (eds.) An Ecological Characterization of Rocky Mountain Montane and Subalpine Wetlands. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver, CO, USA. Biological Report 86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wotring, S. O., D. E. Palmquist, and J. A. Young. 1997. Perennial pepperweed (Lepidium latifolium) rooting charactersitcs. p. 14–15. In Management of Perennial Pepperweed (Tall Whitetop). Agricultural Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA. Special Report 972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. A., C. E. Turner, and L. F. James. 1995. Perennial pepperweed. Rangelands 17: 121–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. A., D. E. Palmquist, R. S. Blank, and C. E. Turner. 1996. Ecology and control of perennial pepperweed (Lepidium latifolium L.). p. 29–31. In J. E. Lovich, J. Randall, and M. D. Kelly (eds.) Proceedings of the California Exotic Pest Plant Council, Symposium 1996, Sacramento, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. A., D. E. Palmquist, and S. O. Wotring. 1997. The invasive nature of Lepidium latifolium: a review. p. 59–68. In J. H. Brock, M. Wade, P. Pyšek, and D. Green (eds.) Plant Invasions: Studies from North America and Europe. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Murray K. Laubhan

    Present address: U.S. Geological Survey, Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, 8711 37th Street SE, 58401, Jamestown, North Dakota, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, 2150 Centre Avenue, Bldng C, 80526, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA

    Murray K. Laubhan

  2. U.S. Geological Survey, Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, 8711 37th Street SE, 58401, Jamestown, North Dakota, USA

    Terry L. Shaffer

Authors
  1. Murray K. Laubhan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Terry L. Shaffer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murray K. Laubhan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Laubhan, M.K., Shaffer, T.L. Seed germination of Cirsium arvense and Lepidium latifolium: Implications for management of montane wetlands. Wetlands 26, 69–78 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2006)26[69:SGOCAA]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2006)26[69:SGOCAA]2.0.CO;2

Key Words

Search

Navigation